header-logo header-logo

A subtle difference

30 October 2015 / Alistair Kinley , Alistair Kinley
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_kinley

Alistair Kinley considers contributions, qualifications & costs

Two appeal cases nearly exactly a year apart deal with subtly different points of claims for contribution between defendants and with costs protection. Both cases arose out of sport or adventure activities.

In the first, Wagenaar v Weekend Travel Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1105, [2014] All ER (D) 24 (Aug), the claimant was injured while skiing in France in 2007 and claimed (under the 1992 Package Travel Regulations) against the tour operator. The second case, South West Strategic Health Authority v Bay Island Voyages [2015] EWCA Civ 708, [2015] All ER (D) 165 (Jul), arose from an incident in a rigid inflatable boat in the Bristol Channel in 2008 (and was brought under the Athens Convention).

Wagenaar

In Wagenaar , the claim was funded by a household legal expenses insurer and therefore the claimant had neither entered into a conditional fee agreement nor taken out after-the-event (ATE) insurance. Proceedings were issued in March 2010. The defendant tour operator’s solicitors subsequently joined the ski guide as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll