header-logo header-logo

A subtle difference

30 October 2015 / Alistair Kinley , Alistair Kinley
Issue: 7674 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
web_kinley

Alistair Kinley considers contributions, qualifications & costs

Two appeal cases nearly exactly a year apart deal with subtly different points of claims for contribution between defendants and with costs protection. Both cases arose out of sport or adventure activities.

In the first, Wagenaar v Weekend Travel Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1105, [2014] All ER (D) 24 (Aug), the claimant was injured while skiing in France in 2007 and claimed (under the 1992 Package Travel Regulations) against the tour operator. The second case, South West Strategic Health Authority v Bay Island Voyages [2015] EWCA Civ 708, [2015] All ER (D) 165 (Jul), arose from an incident in a rigid inflatable boat in the Bristol Channel in 2008 (and was brought under the Athens Convention).

Wagenaar

In Wagenaar , the claim was funded by a household legal expenses insurer and therefore the claimant had neither entered into a conditional fee agreement nor taken out after-the-event (ATE) insurance. Proceedings were issued in March 2010. The defendant tour operator’s solicitors subsequently joined the ski guide as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll