header-logo header-logo

18 January 2021
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Success for solicitors on legal aid bills

Solicitors have won the right to have civil legal aid bills assessed by specialist judges, following legal action brought by the Law Society
The Lord Chancellor confirmed last week that solicitors can choose to have bills between £2,500 and £25,000 assessed by either the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) or specialist judges, while the LAA consults on the best way for legal aid costs to be assessed in future.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is good news for solicitors and anyone needing legally aided advice that the Law Society’s decisive action has prompted the Lord Chancellor to rethink the way solicitors are paid for civil legal aid work that is so vital to preserving access to justice.

‘We brought this action because the LAA announced changes to the way legal aid costs were assessed without a credible consultation or evidence to support moving cost assessments from the courts into the LAA. Our concern was that the LAA may not have the expertise to assess complex costs―historically it has only assessed very low or pre-agreed legal aid bills―whereas cost judges routinely assess the reasonableness of solicitors’ claims for work on complex cases. 

‘Equally concerning, the LAA has a stake in the outcome of costs assessments―as payments come from its budget―and so it will not always be the appropriate arbiter, whereas a costs judge is in a position to make an impartial, expert assessment. We’re relieved the LAA has agreed to engage in a genuine consultation.’

The LAA announced the change in June, prompting the Law Society to take legal action. The Administrative Court has formally endorsed a settlement of the claim, under the terms of which the Lord Chancellor will imminently announce a consultation on the assessment of civil legal aid bills.

The Law Society said the consultation is expected to run during February 2020 leading to a decision in March or April.

Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll