header-logo header-logo

Success for solicitors on legal aid bills

18 January 2021
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
Solicitors have won the right to have civil legal aid bills assessed by specialist judges, following legal action brought by the Law Society
The Lord Chancellor confirmed last week that solicitors can choose to have bills between £2,500 and £25,000 assessed by either the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) or specialist judges, while the LAA consults on the best way for legal aid costs to be assessed in future.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is good news for solicitors and anyone needing legally aided advice that the Law Society’s decisive action has prompted the Lord Chancellor to rethink the way solicitors are paid for civil legal aid work that is so vital to preserving access to justice.

‘We brought this action because the LAA announced changes to the way legal aid costs were assessed without a credible consultation or evidence to support moving cost assessments from the courts into the LAA. Our concern was that the LAA may not have the expertise to assess complex costs―historically it has only assessed very low or pre-agreed legal aid bills―whereas cost judges routinely assess the reasonableness of solicitors’ claims for work on complex cases. 

‘Equally concerning, the LAA has a stake in the outcome of costs assessments―as payments come from its budget―and so it will not always be the appropriate arbiter, whereas a costs judge is in a position to make an impartial, expert assessment. We’re relieved the LAA has agreed to engage in a genuine consultation.’

The LAA announced the change in June, prompting the Law Society to take legal action. The Administrative Court has formally endorsed a settlement of the claim, under the terms of which the Lord Chancellor will imminently announce a consultation on the assessment of civil legal aid bills.

The Law Society said the consultation is expected to run during February 2020 leading to a decision in March or April.

Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll