header-logo header-logo

Sudden divorce fee hike slammed

18 March 2016
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Family lawyers have hit out at the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) “scandalous” decision to raise divorce court fees by more than one third.

The fees increased by 34%, from £410 to £550, on Monday. The Ministry of Justice consulted on proposals to make the increase last summer, but family lawyers only learned last week that the hike would go ahead.

Camilla Fusco, partner at Anthony Gold Solicitors, says the increase will be “a hugely unpopular move with people about to divorce and family lawyers”.

She says it will be “unaffordable for many and impossible to justify in terms of the actual cost to the court service. Divorce centres were introduced last year to make savings and speed up the divorce process.

“To make matters worse, no warning has been given of the new fee coming into effect which will cause confusion and delay with many petitions likely to be held up due to the wrong fee having been paid. It has also made it impossible to file petitions before the date of the increase.”

Jo Edwards, chair of Resolution, says: “Divorce is not a ‘choice to litigate’—it’s a necessary part of the legal process to bring a relationship to an end.

“Whether people mediate, negotiate their own outcome or go to court, they have to pay the divorce petition fee. The actual cost of the administrative process has been shown to be £270, meaning that at new rates the MoJ is making a profit of more than 100%—in effect, levying a divorce tax.

“The government should have waited until the Justice Select Committee, who are currently holding an inquiry into court fees, had published their findings. Instead, the way in which this has been gone about, with no formal consultation or announcement, demonstrates a shocking lack of transparency from government.

“The manner in which they’re implementing this increase, by calling courts [a week before] and instructing them to charge more from Monday, is not how a responsible government department should act.”

Simon Blain, partner at Penningtons Manches, says: “The Ministry of Justice has announced a very significant hike in the fee for issuing divorce proceedings to £550 at extremely short notice and without consultation. The 34% increase was announced on 17 March and will take effect from 21 March, meaning that very few couples will be able to start proceedings before the fees rise. 

All couples going through divorce have to pay the fee, regardless of whether they are able to reach an amicable agreement about their finances and arrangements for the children. Two thirds of petitioners are women, who will be disproportionately affected by this fee increase.”

Issue: 7692 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll