header-logo header-logo

31 July 2015 / Richard Harrison
Issue: 7663 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A suitable project?

nlj_7663_harrison

Richard Harrison scopes out the role of project management in the litigation process

How lawyers and the courts deal with the litigation process can clearly benefit from modern commercial practices. The tenets of modern project management can be applied to progressive dispute resolution methodology. To some extent.

In paras 3.13 and 3.14 of Chapter 48 of his preliminary report on his Review of Litigation Costs (2009), Lord Justice Jackson referred to the work of Professor John Peysner, who had “sought to introduce the concept of project management into the litigation arena”. As Jackson summarises it in the article quoted: “[Professor Peysner] pointed out that project management involved a defined project and the teamwork necessary to achieve the project. He observed that a ‘project’ was a defined task with a beginning and an end, made up of a series of separate activities, each of which absorbs time and money, but which can occur in parallel or subsequently. He concluded that this was akin to litigation and as such litigation was suitable for project management…He concluded

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll