header-logo header-logo

Suitable provision

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Bevan examines the extent to which local authority funded care affects personal injury awards

It is well established that where it can be shown that a claimant will continue to receive what is effectively free local authority provision then this should be taken into account when assessing that claimant’s net claim for future care. This was accepted by both parties as non controversial in Sowden v Lodge; Crookdale v Drury [2004] EWCA Civ 1370, [2005] 1 All ER 581.
Local authorities have a duty to recover the outlay incurred in the exercise of their statutory duties under the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), ss 21 and 29. However, the effect of the various statutes, regulations and ministerial guidance on this topic is that they must disregard for means assessment purposes any award for personal injuries held within personal injury trusts or administered by the court. So unless a claimant blithely accepts a lump sum award without placing it in a personal injury trust, the local authority is required to disregard the existence of often substantial capital

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll