header-logo header-logo

Suitable provision

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Bevan examines the extent to which local authority funded care affects personal injury awards

It is well established that where it can be shown that a claimant will continue to receive what is effectively free local authority provision then this should be taken into account when assessing that claimant’s net claim for future care. This was accepted by both parties as non controversial in Sowden v Lodge; Crookdale v Drury [2004] EWCA Civ 1370, [2005] 1 All ER 581.
Local authorities have a duty to recover the outlay incurred in the exercise of their statutory duties under the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), ss 21 and 29. However, the effect of the various statutes, regulations and ministerial guidance on this topic is that they must disregard for means assessment purposes any award for personal injuries held within personal injury trusts or administered by the court. So unless a claimant blithely accepts a lump sum award without placing it in a personal injury trust, the local authority is required to disregard the existence of often substantial capital

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll