header-logo header-logo

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Suitable provision

Nicholas Bevan examines the extent to which local authority funded care affects personal injury awards

It is well established that where it can be shown that a claimant will continue to receive what is effectively free local authority provision then this should be taken into account when assessing that claimant’s net claim for future care. This was accepted by both parties as non controversial in Sowden v Lodge; Crookdale v Drury [2004] EWCA Civ 1370, [2005] 1 All ER 581.
Local authorities have a duty to recover the outlay incurred in the exercise of their statutory duties under the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), ss 21 and 29. However, the effect of the various statutes, regulations and ministerial guidance on this topic is that they must disregard for means assessment purposes any award for personal injuries held within personal injury trusts or administered by the court. So unless a claimant blithely accepts a lump sum award without placing it in a personal injury trust, the local authority is required to disregard the existence of often substantial capital

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll