header-logo header-logo

Suitable provision

24 May 2007
Issue: 7274 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Bevan examines the extent to which local authority funded care affects personal injury awards

It is well established that where it can be shown that a claimant will continue to receive what is effectively free local authority provision then this should be taken into account when assessing that claimant’s net claim for future care. This was accepted by both parties as non controversial in Sowden v Lodge; Crookdale v Drury [2004] EWCA Civ 1370, [2005] 1 All ER 581.
Local authorities have a duty to recover the outlay incurred in the exercise of their statutory duties under the National Assistance Act 1948 (NAA 1948), ss 21 and 29. However, the effect of the various statutes, regulations and ministerial guidance on this topic is that they must disregard for means assessment purposes any award for personal injuries held within personal injury trusts or administered by the court. So unless a claimant blithely accepts a lump sum award without placing it in a personal injury trust, the local authority is required to disregard the existence of often substantial capital

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll