header-logo header-logo

Supermarket wars

15 December 2011 / Hle Blog
Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

HLE blogger Deborah L Parry wonders if supermarkets are off their trollies

"Last week, four of the UK’s biggest supermarkets were the focus of a report on supermarket price wars for BBC1’s Panorama, which suggested many of the pricing tactics used by supermarkets could potentially be illegal.

Supermarkets, like all other retailers supplying goods to consumers, have to comply with the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (SI 2008/1277).

Regulation 5 prevents traders giving false information or information which deceives or is likely to deceive the average consumer about, the price of products or the existence of a specific price advantage and which causes or is likely to cause the average consumer to take a transactional decision they would not otherwise have taken.

Regulation 6 prohibits misleading omissions where material information is omitted, hidden, unclear, unintelligible, ambiguous or untimely and causes an average consumer to take a different transactional decision from that he would otherwise have taken.

To assist in interpreting these very broad and general prohibitions, the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills has issued the Pricing Practices Guide (November 2010).

This guide has no mandatory force and may, in some instances, go beyond what the law requires. It does, however, take into account the requirements of the Regulations and provides guidance for traders ‘on good practice in giving information about prices’. One would hope and expect our leading supermarkets to do their utmost to follow it.

In light of the current supermarket ‘price wars’, there are concerns over the way some products are marketed and the wording used in relation to prices. Asda, for example, in addition to their ‘Rollback’ pricing promotions, also have had items marked, both on the shelves in supermarkets and online, as ‘WOW’ items...”

To continue reading go to: www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

Muckle LLP—Phoebe Gogarty

North East firm welcomes employment specialist

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Browne Jacobson—Colette Withey

Partner joins commercial and technology practice

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Ellisons—Lizzy Firmin

Chief operating officer joins equity partnership

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
back-to-top-scroll