header-logo header-logo

Supervising barristers

13 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

BSB introduce new supervisory scheme for barristers

“Risky” chambers will be identified and given extra regulatory support under a new supervisory scheme for barristers.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) will assess how well chambers and sole practitioners are managing potential risks, and those identified as “high risk” will be given extra support to ensure non-compliance does not recur. 

Low-risk chambers, on the other hand, will have little contact with the BSB.

The new scheme begins in January, and the BSB will send chambers an “impact audit survey” in the spring to gauge the effect any breach of the regulatory rules would have on the public. Chambers will then complete a “supervision return form”, showing how they manage potential risks.

BSB head of quality Oliver Hanmer says: “We all know that prevention is better than cure.”

Perceived risks include poor client service, ineffective governance, lack of equality and diversity, incompetent or dishonest financial management, and inadequate pupillage or training.

Stephen Dale, author of the Pupillage Blog, which offers advice to those seeking a career at the Bar, says he welcomes “any safeguards to prevent inadequate or unfair pupillage or training”.

“From the perspective of the pupil who has attained pupillage with a set, their training and ongoing mentoring is crucial to their success as an advocate.”

The BSB advises chambers to ensure their records are up-to-date, appoint a member as a point of contact with the regulator, and be honest and open.

The new scheme replaces the old chambers monitoring system under which chambers were contacted to verify compliance in key areas.

Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll