header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court fees shake-up

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published proposals to reform Supreme Court fees and raise an extra £170,000–£210,000 per year

A 40% uplift in fees is proposed, accounting for inflation since the fees were last set in 2011.

The MoJ aims to simplify the fee structure, combining the fees for initiating an appeal and submitting the key facts, and combining and uplifting the fees for costs.

It proposes removing the distinction between devolution jurisdiction case and civil case fees, which are set at a higher rate. It states, in its consultation document, ‘We do not see any reason why litigants bringing claims relating to the court’s devolution jurisdiction would be any more financially vulnerable than litigants bringing civil appeals’. There have been ten devolution applications in the past five years.

Affordability provisions such as the statutory fee remission scheme and the Chief Executive’s discretion to reduce or remit fees will be unaffected.

Respond to the consultation, Reforming fees in the UK Supreme Court, by 11:59pm on 27 November.  

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll