header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court fees shake-up

18 October 2023
Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published proposals to reform Supreme Court fees and raise an extra £170,000–£210,000 per year

A 40% uplift in fees is proposed, accounting for inflation since the fees were last set in 2011.

The MoJ aims to simplify the fee structure, combining the fees for initiating an appeal and submitting the key facts, and combining and uplifting the fees for costs.

It proposes removing the distinction between devolution jurisdiction case and civil case fees, which are set at a higher rate. It states, in its consultation document, ‘We do not see any reason why litigants bringing claims relating to the court’s devolution jurisdiction would be any more financially vulnerable than litigants bringing civil appeals’. There have been ten devolution applications in the past five years.

Affordability provisions such as the statutory fee remission scheme and the Chief Executive’s discretion to reduce or remit fees will be unaffected.

Respond to the consultation, Reforming fees in the UK Supreme Court, by 11:59pm on 27 November.  

Issue: 8045 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll