header-logo header-logo

01 October 2009
Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court Opens for Business

A new chapter in legal history began today, 1 October 2009, when the new Supreme Court of the UK opened for business.

The new Court, at Middlesex Guildhall in London’s Parliament Square, replaces the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords as the site of Britain’s highest court.

The building has undergone extensive renovation.

The former Law Lords will be known as Justices of the Supreme Court, and will be headed by Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, President of the Supreme Court.

The new Justices gathered in Court 1 at 10am, wearing their Supreme Court ceremonial robes, to be sworn in and take the Oath of Allegiance and the Judicial Oath.

They then formed a procession to cross the road from the Court to Westminster Abbey to attend the annual service that marks the start of the legal year in England and Wales.

Lord Phillips said: “For the first time, we have a clear separation of powers between the legislature, the judiciary and the executive in the United Kingdom.

This is important. It emphasises

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll