header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court review

20 January 2011 / Oliver Gayner
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Oliver Gayner reviews the work of the last three terms in the UK Supreme Court

The Supreme Court continues to process an impressively heavy workload. According to its end of year review published in August, in its first 12 months the court heard 67 appeals, handed down 62 judgments considered 206 applications for permission to appeal, and welcomed over 40,000 visitors through the door. Including the Michaelmas term recently ended, that is 85 appeals and 74 judgments in 14 months.

Two clear trends emerge from the decided cases. First, over a third of all cases have featured human rights issues. The “quasi-constitutional” nature of the court’s work is a point considered in more detail below. Second, appellants have a surprising high chance of success: in 43% of cases, the Court of Appeal was overturned.

Of the decided cases, there have been a number of headline grabbers: for example, Radmacher achieved almost the same column inches as JFS (the Jewish schools discrimination case) had in 2009. It is clear that the court is generally succeeding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll