header-logo header-logo

20 January 2011 / Oliver Gayner
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court review

Oliver Gayner reviews the work of the last three terms in the UK Supreme Court

The Supreme Court continues to process an impressively heavy workload. According to its end of year review published in August, in its first 12 months the court heard 67 appeals, handed down 62 judgments considered 206 applications for permission to appeal, and welcomed over 40,000 visitors through the door. Including the Michaelmas term recently ended, that is 85 appeals and 74 judgments in 14 months.

Two clear trends emerge from the decided cases. First, over a third of all cases have featured human rights issues. The “quasi-constitutional” nature of the court’s work is a point considered in more detail below. Second, appellants have a surprising high chance of success: in 43% of cases, the Court of Appeal was overturned.

Of the decided cases, there have been a number of headline grabbers: for example, Radmacher achieved almost the same column inches as JFS (the Jewish schools discrimination case) had in 2009. It is clear that the court is generally succeeding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
back-to-top-scroll