header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court review

20 January 2011 / Oliver Gayner
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Oliver Gayner reviews the work of the last three terms in the UK Supreme Court

The Supreme Court continues to process an impressively heavy workload. According to its end of year review published in August, in its first 12 months the court heard 67 appeals, handed down 62 judgments considered 206 applications for permission to appeal, and welcomed over 40,000 visitors through the door. Including the Michaelmas term recently ended, that is 85 appeals and 74 judgments in 14 months.

Two clear trends emerge from the decided cases. First, over a third of all cases have featured human rights issues. The “quasi-constitutional” nature of the court’s work is a point considered in more detail below. Second, appellants have a surprising high chance of success: in 43% of cases, the Court of Appeal was overturned.

Of the decided cases, there have been a number of headline grabbers: for example, Radmacher achieved almost the same column inches as JFS (the Jewish schools discrimination case) had in 2009. It is clear that the court is generally succeeding

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll