header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court rules on overpayments

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Housing benefit & tax credits unaffected

The government cannot recover overpayments of social security benefits where the claimant is not at fault, the Supreme Court has ruled.

In the 12 months from March 2006, the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) wrote to more than 65,000 claimants warning them they had been overpaid and could be sued for repayment.

The letters acknowledged the overpayments were entirely the fault of the government’s own administrative errors—and therefore not recoverable under statutory law, s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992—but warned that court action would be taken under common law in the county court.

Delivering judgment in Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54, Lord Brown said it was “common ground” that overpayment resulting from misrepresentation or non-disclosure could be recovered under s 71.

The issue, he said, was whether s 71 provided an “exclusive code for recovery” or whether common law could be used to recover overpayment arising from “official error”.

Holding the former option, Lord Brown said: “It seems to me inconceivable that Parliament would have contemplated leaving the suggested common law restitutionary route to the recovery of overpayments available to the secretary of state to be pursued by way of ordinary court proceedings alongside the carefully prescribed scheme of recovery set out in the statute.

“Such an arrangement, moreover, would seem to me to create well-nigh insoluble problems. Could there, for example, be parallel recovery proceedings against the maker of the misrepresentation under section 71(3) and against the recipient of the benefit at common law in the courts?”

The ruling does not affect overpayments of housing benefit or tax credits.

 

Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll