header-logo header-logo

Supreme Court rules on overpayments

16 December 2010
Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Housing benefit & tax credits unaffected

The government cannot recover overpayments of social security benefits where the claimant is not at fault, the Supreme Court has ruled.

In the 12 months from March 2006, the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) wrote to more than 65,000 claimants warning them they had been overpaid and could be sued for repayment.

The letters acknowledged the overpayments were entirely the fault of the government’s own administrative errors—and therefore not recoverable under statutory law, s 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992—but warned that court action would be taken under common law in the county court.

Delivering judgment in Child Poverty Action Group v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54, Lord Brown said it was “common ground” that overpayment resulting from misrepresentation or non-disclosure could be recovered under s 71.

The issue, he said, was whether s 71 provided an “exclusive code for recovery” or whether common law could be used to recover overpayment arising from “official error”.

Holding the former option, Lord Brown said: “It seems to me inconceivable that Parliament would have contemplated leaving the suggested common law restitutionary route to the recovery of overpayments available to the secretary of state to be pursued by way of ordinary court proceedings alongside the carefully prescribed scheme of recovery set out in the statute.

“Such an arrangement, moreover, would seem to me to create well-nigh insoluble problems. Could there, for example, be parallel recovery proceedings against the maker of the misrepresentation under section 71(3) and against the recipient of the benefit at common law in the courts?”

The ruling does not affect overpayments of housing benefit or tax credits.

 

Issue: 7446 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll