header-logo header-logo

06 May 2020
Categories: Legal News , Aviation , Environment
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court will hear third runway appeal

The Supreme Court has given Heathrow Airport permission to appeal a ruling that its plan for a third runway was unlawful

The decision this week, in R (oao Friends of the Earth & others) v Heathrow Airport, sets the scene for a showdown between the airport and climate change campaigners. The decision was made by Lords Reed, Hodge and Sales. No date has yet been set for the hearing.

The Court of Appeal held in February that the government’s Airports National Policy Statement allowing the third runway to go ahead failed to take account of the UK’s responsibilities under the Paris Agreement on climate change.

The Paris Agreement, which the UK ratified in 2016, enshrined an aspiration to achieve net zero emissions of greenhouse gases. 

Categories: Legal News , Aviation , Environment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll