header-logo header-logo

Surrogacy mothers can have maternity leave

01 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Advocate-General splits maternity leave between commissioning & surrogate mothers

A woman who has a child with a surrogate mother is entitled to maternity leave, according to a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The woman (Ms CD) did not provide ovum but her partner provided the sperm. By law, the woman who gave birth was regarded as the mother. However, they were granted a parental order under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 nearly four months later. While maternity leave and adoption leave are paid, women who have children through a surrogate are entitled only to unpaid leave in certain conditions, under national law.

The woman’s employer, an NHS Foundation hospital, initially refused her request for time off “for surrogacy”, but later reconsidered and granted paid adoption leave. However, the woman claimed unfair dismissal and the case was referred to the Court of Justice to determine whether in accordance with EU law a woman has the right to receive paid maternity leave when a surrogate mother has given birth to a child. Delivering her opinion in the case, Attorney-General Kokott said both mothers should be given at least two weeks’ leave, but there should be no “doubling” of leave. She ruled out the possibility of unfavourable treatment of the intended mother relating to pregnancy because she was not pregnant, and found no evidence of direct or indirect discrimination. Therefore, the remaining 10 weeks of leave should be divided between them.

Rita D’Alton-Harrison, a qualified solicitor and senior lecturer at the University of Hertfordshire, says that, although preliminary rulings do not bind national courts, it is likely that the employment tribunal which referred the case would find in Ms CD’s favour. 

“This is an important step towards the recognition of legal motherhood for commissioning mothers, and it is hoped that it will herald the much delayed separate legislation on surrogacy, which was called for by the Brazier Committee as far  back as 1998 and the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee in 2005,” she adds. 

Issue: 7578 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll