header-logo header-logo

Surrogacy under review

10 May 2018
Issue: 7792 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law Commissioners have begun work on a major review of the law on surrogacy. Current difficulties include ensuring the practice is well regulated and that surrogates abroad are not being exploited. The wording of parental orders can also create tensions for intended parents where medical decisions about the child are being made. Professor Nick Hopkins, Law Commissioner for England and Wales, who is conducting the review along with the Scottish Law Commission, said: ‘Our society has moved on from when surrogacy laws were first introduced 30 years ago and, now, they are not fit for purpose.’

Issue: 7792 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll