A defendant’s surveillance evidence of the claimant on a personal injury claim may be allowed where it would substantially reduce the award of damages—so long as the claimant has not been ambushed, the High Court held in Hayden v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 1121 (QB). District Judge Stephen Gold, writing in NLJ this week, surveys the case and how the judge reached the decision.
03 June 2016
Surveillance evidence
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Weightmans—Jason Slatcher
Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer
Mishcon de Reya—trainees
Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%
Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton
Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices
NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
