header-logo header-logo

Survey uncovers real cost of reform

04 April 2014
Issue: 7601 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Second NLJ/LSLA Litigation Trends Survey tracks impact one year on from Jackson

Nearly three-quarters of lawyers say civil litigation costs have increased not decreased since the Jackson reforms, according to the second Litigation Trends Survey by NLJ and the London Solicitors’ Litigation Association (LSLA), published this week.

Civil litigators responding to the survey of LSLA’s 1,400 members bemoan a return of pre-Woolf adversarial days, noting an increase in rigid, aggressive behaviour and an unhealthy obsession with point-scoring. Such behaviour was elbowing out pre-Mitchell pragmatism, flexibility and co-operation between parties, which used to get the job done sensibly for clients. 

Asked if case management behaviour on specified time limits had altered as a result of Mitchell, 72% of respondents said “Yes”.

Seamus Smyth, partner at Carter Lemon Camerons, comments: “Mitchell has served to reinforce the need for absolute compliance with rules, orders and timetables.

“More resources go into ensuring this compliance—which increases cost, at least for the next few years—and the management of litigation is to that extent tighter, but not otherwise different in principle.”

The survey states: “It is generally agreed that timetables have extended with both parties being more cautious about setting deadlines that they might struggle to meet.

“This is increasing both costs and delays in litigation with County Courts in particular said to be ‘at crisis point’ following the Mitchell decision.”

Respondents also expressed concerns that the need for strict adherence to deadlines coupled with a lack of consistency of application throughout the courts have led to satellite litigation.

Commenting for the survey, Ted Greeno, partner at Quinn, Emanuel, Urquhart & Sullivan, says: “Sanctions, like targets, distort behaviour.

“It is surprising that the centuries-old aim of doing justice between the parties has been abandoned in the interests of administrative cost savings.”

The survey also details the views of litigators on after the event insurance, conditional fee agreements, damages-based agreements, access to justice and changes in litigation strategy.

Issue: 7601 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll