header-logo header-logo

In suspense

13 June 2014 / Robert Jordan
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
web_pp_bankruptcy_jordan

Robert Jordan considers applications to suspend discharge of a bankruptcy order

Over the last five years the number of applications to suspend automatic discharge has reduced from 1,970 in 2008/9 to 1,218 in 2012/3. The suspension of automatic discharge is penal to ensure cooperation during the investigation phase.

IA 1986

An application to suspend the discharge of a bankruptcy order is made under s 279 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986). This prevents the automatic discharge and the end of one year “beginning with the date on which the bankruptcy commences”. Any application must be commenced before the automatic discharge as the application is to suspend that discharge.

The application can be made by either the official receiver or trustee (s 279(3)) and the court may order that the automatic discharge shall cease to run until: “(a) the end of a specified period, or (b) the fulfillment of a specified condition.”

The court may make an order (s 279(4)) only “if satisfied that the bankrupt has failed or is failing to comply with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll