header-logo header-logo

24 July 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail

TA6 row comes to head as Chancery Lane votes

The TA6 property law controversy resulted in a close call for the Law Society this week, as a vote of confidence took place at Chancery Lane

Property lawyers are disputing the Law Society’s updating a conveyancing form, TA6, in line with National Trading Standards guidance on ‘material information’ (MI). The Property Lawyers Action Group (PLAG) disputes the need for the update on the basis the guidance is not legally binding, and fears the change to the form will result in flawed information being included, which could increase lawyers’ risk of civil liability or even put them at risk of committing a criminal offence.

In June, more than 100 members, organised by the PLAG, instigated a vote of no confidence in the Law Society president, Nick Emmerson, and chief executive, Ian Jeffery, to represent members who practise conveyancing.

It took place at a special general meeting at the Law Society headquarters this week, chaired by deputy vice president Mark Evans. The results were 123 For, 207 Against, with 20 Abstentions. Accordingly, the vote was lost.

Amerdeep Somal, chair of the Law Society Board, and Mark Evans, deputy vice president of the Law Society, said: ‘The Law Society Council and Board fully support the President and CEO and are pleased with the outcome of today’s vote.

‘We have listened to the concerns raised by some of our members on this specific issue. It is important to note that we have already taken steps to address these concerns by postponing the compulsory implementation of the updated TA6 form. We have also launched a consultation to ensure we understand the full range of member views.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll