header-logo header-logo

TA6 row comes to head as Chancery Lane votes

24 July 2024
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Property , Conveyancing
printer mail-detail
The TA6 property law controversy resulted in a close call for the Law Society this week, as a vote of confidence took place at Chancery Lane

Property lawyers are disputing the Law Society’s updating a conveyancing form, TA6, in line with National Trading Standards guidance on ‘material information’ (MI). The Property Lawyers Action Group (PLAG) disputes the need for the update on the basis the guidance is not legally binding, and fears the change to the form will result in flawed information being included, which could increase lawyers’ risk of civil liability or even put them at risk of committing a criminal offence.

In June, more than 100 members, organised by the PLAG, instigated a vote of no confidence in the Law Society president, Nick Emmerson, and chief executive, Ian Jeffery, to represent members who practise conveyancing.

It took place at a special general meeting at the Law Society headquarters this week, chaired by deputy vice president Mark Evans. The results were 123 For, 207 Against, with 20 Abstentions. Accordingly, the vote was lost.

Amerdeep Somal, chair of the Law Society Board, and Mark Evans, deputy vice president of the Law Society, said: ‘The Law Society Council and Board fully support the President and CEO and are pleased with the outcome of today’s vote.

‘We have listened to the concerns raised by some of our members on this specific issue. It is important to note that we have already taken steps to address these concerns by postponing the compulsory implementation of the updated TA6 form. We have also launched a consultation to ensure we understand the full range of member views.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll