header-logo header-logo

Tackling exclusion

10 June 2022
Issue: 7982 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail
The Legal Services Board (LSB), eight regulators and two disciplinary tribunals have committed themselves to taking action to ensure more inclusive workplaces

They signed a set of principles, ‘Tackling counter-inclusive misconduct through disciplinary processes’, which acknowledge it is still harder to progress to senior levels in the legal profession if you are a woman, from an ethnic minority background, LGBTQ+, or from a low-income background. They committed to ensuring training, procedures and policies are in place to enable them to impose sanctions that make clear the seriousness of sexual misconduct, racial or other discrimination or bullying.

Matthew Hill, LSB chief executive, said: ‘We will work together to tackle and stamp out exclusionary conduct, including inappropriate banter, bullying and sexual misconduct.’

Alison Kellett, President of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said: ‘The Tribunal will impose sanctions that reflect the seriousness of the misconduct found proved in cases involving sexual misconduct, racial or other discrimination or bullying.’

Issue: 7982 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll