header-logo header-logo

04 November 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Tackling misogyny & street harassment

Nottingham Law School lecturers have called for more creativity in changing attitudes to misogyny and street harassment
The lecturers said ‘far more needs to be done to tackle social attitudes and effect change, yet the government seems satisfied that there is nothing more to be done’. They pointed to recent comments from the Prime Minister that recording misogyny as hate crimes would place an extra strain on police officers and that there is already abundant legislation to tackle violence against women.

They also highlighted Justice Secretary Dominic Raab’s confusion last month about the meaning of ‘misogny’, when he said ‘misogyny is absolutely wrong whether it’s a man against a woman or a woman against a man’.

The lecturers said the issue had reached ‘epidemic proportions’ and needed to be tackled ‘at its root. Social attitudes need to change about what’s acceptable and what’s not. And when people don’t want to listen, communication needs to be far, far smarter to get them to engage and have a hope of changing their minds’.

One example of smarter communication, they said, was Police Scotland’s ‘Don’t be that guy’ video, which had a lot of traction on social media and received praise for highlighting that men, rather than women, need to take action to call out bad behaviour.

Nottingham Law School developed a cartoon-style educational tool to tackle the harassment of women and girls last year, along with Nottingham Trent University and University of Nottingham. The online comic strip, ‘Changing Minds’, used story-telling techniques to convey the impact of harassment on girls and women, the frequency of such behaviour, and how it fuels fear, damages wellbeing and causes women and girls to withdraw from public space.

The comic strip can be read here

Last year, the Law Commission proposed legislative reform to add ‘sex or gender’ to the protected characteristics for hate crime laws. The other characteristics are race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identity.

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll