header-logo header-logo

Tackling misogyny & street harassment

04 November 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail
Nottingham Law School lecturers have called for more creativity in changing attitudes to misogyny and street harassment
The lecturers said ‘far more needs to be done to tackle social attitudes and effect change, yet the government seems satisfied that there is nothing more to be done’. They pointed to recent comments from the Prime Minister that recording misogyny as hate crimes would place an extra strain on police officers and that there is already abundant legislation to tackle violence against women.

They also highlighted Justice Secretary Dominic Raab’s confusion last month about the meaning of ‘misogny’, when he said ‘misogyny is absolutely wrong whether it’s a man against a woman or a woman against a man’.

The lecturers said the issue had reached ‘epidemic proportions’ and needed to be tackled ‘at its root. Social attitudes need to change about what’s acceptable and what’s not. And when people don’t want to listen, communication needs to be far, far smarter to get them to engage and have a hope of changing their minds’.

One example of smarter communication, they said, was Police Scotland’s ‘Don’t be that guy’ video, which had a lot of traction on social media and received praise for highlighting that men, rather than women, need to take action to call out bad behaviour.

Nottingham Law School developed a cartoon-style educational tool to tackle the harassment of women and girls last year, along with Nottingham Trent University and University of Nottingham. The online comic strip, ‘Changing Minds’, used story-telling techniques to convey the impact of harassment on girls and women, the frequency of such behaviour, and how it fuels fear, damages wellbeing and causes women and girls to withdraw from public space.

The comic strip can be read here

Last year, the Law Commission proposed legislative reform to add ‘sex or gender’ to the protected characteristics for hate crime laws. The other characteristics are race, religion, sexual orientation, disability and transgender identity.

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll