header-logo header-logo

Tackling sexual harassment in the workplace

21 February 2019 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

It’s time for lawyers to contribute to the debate on confidentiality agreements, says Juliet Carp

The Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) works hard to share the practical and legal experience of its 6,000 employment lawyer members with those looking to develop good workplace laws—but lawyers from all specialisms could help inform current debate on laws related to sexual harassment. We should start with the cry for a ‘ban’ on ‘gagging orders’ and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). At root there is a real —and serious—concern that confidentiality terms in agreements used to settle employment disputes are allowing serial workplace harassers to ‘bury their crimes’ and ‘get away with it’. Some myth-busting would help so that we can focus properly on options for change:

  • Criminal sexual assault and criminal harassment are just that, crimes. Any employee may report a crime, or suspicion of a crime, to the police. Those reporting do not need to be victims. Employees should not be discouraged from reporting a crime—and regardless of what they sign, they may still
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll