header-logo header-logo

21 February 2019 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Tackling sexual harassment in the workplace

It’s time for lawyers to contribute to the debate on confidentiality agreements, says Juliet Carp

The Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) works hard to share the practical and legal experience of its 6,000 employment lawyer members with those looking to develop good workplace laws—but lawyers from all specialisms could help inform current debate on laws related to sexual harassment. We should start with the cry for a ‘ban’ on ‘gagging orders’ and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). At root there is a real —and serious—concern that confidentiality terms in agreements used to settle employment disputes are allowing serial workplace harassers to ‘bury their crimes’ and ‘get away with it’. Some myth-busting would help so that we can focus properly on options for change:

  • Criminal sexual assault and criminal harassment are just that, crimes. Any employee may report a crime, or suspicion of a crime, to the police. Those reporting do not need to be victims. Employees should not be discouraged from reporting a crime—and regardless of what they sign, they may still report
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll