header-logo header-logo

Tackling sexual harassment in the workplace

21 February 2019 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

It’s time for lawyers to contribute to the debate on confidentiality agreements, says Juliet Carp

The Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) works hard to share the practical and legal experience of its 6,000 employment lawyer members with those looking to develop good workplace laws—but lawyers from all specialisms could help inform current debate on laws related to sexual harassment. We should start with the cry for a ‘ban’ on ‘gagging orders’ and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). At root there is a real —and serious—concern that confidentiality terms in agreements used to settle employment disputes are allowing serial workplace harassers to ‘bury their crimes’ and ‘get away with it’. Some myth-busting would help so that we can focus properly on options for change:

  • Criminal sexual assault and criminal harassment are just that, crimes. Any employee may report a crime, or suspicion of a crime, to the police. Those reporting do not need to be victims. Employees should not be discouraged from reporting a crime—and regardless of what they sign, they may still
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll