header-logo header-logo

21 February 2019 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Tackling sexual harassment in the workplace

It’s time for lawyers to contribute to the debate on confidentiality agreements, says Juliet Carp

The Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) works hard to share the practical and legal experience of its 6,000 employment lawyer members with those looking to develop good workplace laws—but lawyers from all specialisms could help inform current debate on laws related to sexual harassment. We should start with the cry for a ‘ban’ on ‘gagging orders’ and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). At root there is a real —and serious—concern that confidentiality terms in agreements used to settle employment disputes are allowing serial workplace harassers to ‘bury their crimes’ and ‘get away with it’. Some myth-busting would help so that we can focus properly on options for change:

  • Criminal sexual assault and criminal harassment are just that, crimes. Any employee may report a crime, or suspicion of a crime, to the police. Those reporting do not need to be victims. Employees should not be discouraged from reporting a crime—and regardless of what they sign, they may still report
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll