header-logo header-logo

09 February 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Take my word for it...

nlj_7780_samuels

Think carefully before you provide a recommendation, says Alec Samuels

In contemporary society, especially in the business and commercial parts of society, it is very common to ask for a recommendation, reference or accreditation verification. Somebody may ask the Law Society for ‘the name of a good solicitor in town A’. Or a solicitor may ask the General Medical Council or a Royal College for the name of a good medical expert to instruct for a possible litigation matter. Or a question may be asked of a bank or an accountancy firm or a pensions consultant or a surveyor practice or a trade association or local trading standards department or one of these bodies that produce directories of experts. Or a name may just be taken from a directory. 

Special relationships

The matter may be covered by contract, and accordingly be governed by the terms of the contract. But if there is no contract, and things go badly wrong, then the claimant must seek to rely upon the Hedley Byrne v Heller

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll