header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail

Take note of Canada’s first online court

nlj_7751_smith

What can we learn from the new Civil Resolution Tribunal? Quite a lot, says Roger Smith

With the government gearing up to introduce online courts, it’s wellworth taking a look across the Atlantic.

On 1 June 2017, Canada’s first online tribunal, the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), began accepting small claims for $5,000 or less in British Columbia (BC). It has already been accepting “strata property” disputes for the past 11 months.

CRT strengths

Regardless of how well the CRT works, the BC courts have certainly succeeded in being transparent. They have posted a blog announcing progress to the world. They have appointed a judge, Shannon Salter, as its head, and she has cultivated a high public profile. The CRT’s website publishes important decisions (three are currently available), which appear to show an online methodology not that far from the traditional. Costs seem reasonable. The fee to issue a case worth less than $3,000 is about £35 if you do it online with another £23 for a hearing. It is too soon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll