header-logo header-logo

Take note of Canada’s first online court

23 June 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7751_smith

What can we learn from the new Civil Resolution Tribunal? Quite a lot, says Roger Smith

With the government gearing up to introduce online courts, it’s wellworth taking a look across the Atlantic.

On 1 June 2017, Canada’s first online tribunal, the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), began accepting small claims for $5,000 or less in British Columbia (BC). It has already been accepting “strata property” disputes for the past 11 months.

CRT strengths

Regardless of how well the CRT works, the BC courts have certainly succeeded in being transparent. They have posted a blog announcing progress to the world. They have appointed a judge, Shannon Salter, as its head, and she has cultivated a high public profile. The CRT’s website publishes important decisions (three are currently available), which appear to show an online methodology not that far from the traditional. Costs seem reasonable. The fee to issue a case worth less than $3,000 is about £35 if you do it online with another £23 for a hearing. It is too soon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll