header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
09 February 2024 / David Locke
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Cyber , Cybercrime , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Taking down the deepfakes

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
157364
Legislating against deepfake images seems necessary, but the practicalities are complex, writes David Locke
  • Considers the creators and publishers of deepfakes, and the respective challenges when it comes to prosecuting.
  • Explains the various factors governing the offence threshold that complicate legislative intervention.

The circulation of AI-generated ‘deepfakes’ of Taylor Swift has prompted calls for urgent legislative intervention. Even the White House was moved to offer its support for criminalisation, apparently failing to recognise its own failure to take action despite the proliferation of deepfake technology for many years. However, translating the outrage into workable legislation will prove a significant challenge on both sides of the Atlantic.

The creator

Various deepfake AI programmes are openly accessible online. Anyone can visit a hosting website and request the creation of an image. Typically this is done by selecting preferences across various categories, but leaving significant latitude in respect of the final design. The AI programme will then produce the image. Herein lies a difficulty that is both literal and philosophical:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll