header-logo header-logo

09 February 2024 / David Locke
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Cyber , Cybercrime , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

Taking down the deepfakes

157364
Legislating against deepfake images seems necessary, but the practicalities are complex, writes David Locke
  • Considers the creators and publishers of deepfakes, and the respective challenges when it comes to prosecuting.
  • Explains the various factors governing the offence threshold that complicate legislative intervention.

The circulation of AI-generated ‘deepfakes’ of Taylor Swift has prompted calls for urgent legislative intervention. Even the White House was moved to offer its support for criminalisation, apparently failing to recognise its own failure to take action despite the proliferation of deepfake technology for many years. However, translating the outrage into workable legislation will prove a significant challenge on both sides of the Atlantic.

The creator

Various deepfake AI programmes are openly accessible online. Anyone can visit a hosting website and request the creation of an image. Typically this is done by selecting preferences across various categories, but leaving significant latitude in respect of the final design. The AI programme will then produce the image. Herein lies a difficulty that is both literal and philosophical:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll