header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Taking responsibility

istock_000017881179medium

Claire Sanders examines the developing use of special guardianship orders

Special guardianship orders have become an increasingly popular means of resolving family proceedings. They have found favour with local authorities as a means of securing kinship care placements and have been described as a half-way house between a residence order and an adoption order.

Under s 14 F of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) local authorities are required to make arrangements within their area to provide support for special guardians. The support services may be counselling, advice and information or such other services, including financial support as are prescribed by regulation. The obligations that are imposed on the local authority are significant and may continue for many years after the making of the order.

It may not always be automatically clear which local authority will have to assume responsibility for providing support where, for example, the prospective special guardian lives in a different local authority area to the one in which the child lives.

That was the case in Re Y (Children)(Special guardianship:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll