header-logo header-logo

10 May 2013 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7559 / Categories: Features , Family , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Taking responsibility

istock_000017881179medium

Claire Sanders examines the developing use of special guardianship orders

Special guardianship orders have become an increasingly popular means of resolving family proceedings. They have found favour with local authorities as a means of securing kinship care placements and have been described as a half-way house between a residence order and an adoption order.

Under s 14 F of the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989) local authorities are required to make arrangements within their area to provide support for special guardians. The support services may be counselling, advice and information or such other services, including financial support as are prescribed by regulation. The obligations that are imposed on the local authority are significant and may continue for many years after the making of the order.

It may not always be automatically clear which local authority will have to assume responsibility for providing support where, for example, the prospective special guardian lives in a different local authority area to the one in which the child lives.

That was the case in Re Y (Children)(Special guardianship:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll