header-logo header-logo

16 October 2026 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8181 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Taking the Chiltern Hundreds (Pt 2)

261509
© Getty images

Neil Parpworth makes the case for ending this constitutional anomaly, and replacing it with a simple statutory mechanism

  • MPs remain unable to resign directly and must instead accept the Chiltern Hundreds or a similar office of profit.
  • A simple statutory notice procedure, modelled on arrangements in the devolved legislatures and House of Lords, would make Parliament—not the executive—the proper recipient of an MP’s resignation.

As a result of a resolution passed by the House of Commons in 1624, MPs are constitutionally debarred from resigning. Accordingly, if an MP wishes to vacate their seat during the life of a parliament, they are obliged to apply for a former office of profit under the Crown.

Part 1 of this article (see NLJ, 2 October 2026, pp9 & 10) considered the origins of this customary practice, and how it has operated. The scale on which it has been used is evident from the fact that between 1 May 1880 and 8 July 2026, 633 MPs left the House of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll