header-logo header-logo

23 July 2015
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Talent spotting at the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court should use a “tiebreaker” clause to appoint new justices, a review by the court’s chief executive Jenny Rowe has recommended.

The clause, which gives effect to the “equal merit” provision in the Crime and Courts Act 2013, tips the balance in favour of candidates from under-represented groups where two candidates are otherwise equally qualified. Rowe also recommends that “talent spotting” methods should be developed, mentoring for potential candidates be introduced, and more succession planning take place to assess the future needs of the court.

The review invited views from members of past selection commissions as well as academics and a range of other parties.

Lord Neuberger says: “I am content for a number of the recommendations to be taken forward immediately while others will require further discussion with interested parties. Work on this will start in the autumn and will be carried forward by Jenny’s successor.”

Issue: 7662 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll