header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Tattoo taboo

In brief

A Blackpool tattoo parlour has had to pay out £2,500 in compensation plus costs for refusing to give a 24-year-old woman a tattoo because she is disabled. Cerebral palsy sufferer, Rachael Monk, who uses a wheelchair and speaks through a Delta Talker, visited Body Creation with her family and requested a tattoo of a fairy on her arm. Owner Jordan Dean told the family: “We don’t do people like that,” before calling in his dad who, according to the judge, adopted an “old-fashioned and highly discriminatory attitude” and offered “gratuitous insults”. The family contacted the Disability Rights Commission, and the case went to court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland—Claire Petheram

Eversheds Sutherland strengthens top-ranked pensions practice with appointment of former global head of pensions

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

mfg Solicitors—Hannah Finnegan

Law firm strengthens private client team to support continued growth

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires—Andrew Cromb

Devonshires expands offering with appointment of tax partner Andrew Cromb

NEWS
Mr Justice Nicklin’s decision to order costs on an indemnity basis may be a ‘significant win’ but it’s still ‘far from game, set and match’ for Associated Newspapers, a former costs judge has said
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll