header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Tattoo taboo

In brief

A Blackpool tattoo parlour has had to pay out £2,500 in compensation plus costs for refusing to give a 24-year-old woman a tattoo because she is disabled. Cerebral palsy sufferer, Rachael Monk, who uses a wheelchair and speaks through a Delta Talker, visited Body Creation with her family and requested a tattoo of a fairy on her arm. Owner Jordan Dean told the family: “We don’t do people like that,” before calling in his dad who, according to the judge, adopted an “old-fashioned and highly discriminatory attitude” and offered “gratuitous insults”. The family contacted the Disability Rights Commission, and the case went to court.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll