header-logo header-logo

08 March 2013
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Noor [2013] UKUT 071 (TCC), [2013] All ER (D) 299 (Feb)

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) did not have jurisdiction to give effect to any legitimate expectation that a taxpayer might be able to establish in relation to any credit for input tax. The right of appeal given by s 83(1)(c) of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 was an appeal in respect of a person’s right to credit for input tax under the VAT legislation. Accordingly, if the Revenue had power (whether as part of their care and management powers or some other statutory power) to enter into an agreement with a taxpayer and that agreement, according to its terms, resulted in an entitlement to a different amount of credit for input tax than would have resulted in the absence of the agreement, the amount ascertained in accordance with the agreement might be one arising “under the VAT legislation”. In contrast, a person might claim a right based on legitimate expectation which went behind his entitlement ascertained in accordance with the VAT legislation (in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll