header-logo header-logo

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Chancellor, Masters & Scholars of the University of Cambridge v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 444 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 52 (Sep)

It was settled law that the mere acquisition and holding of shares was not to be regarded as an economic activity within the meaning of the Sixth Council Directive (EEC) 77/388 (on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes—Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment) (the Sixth Directive). The mere acquisition of financial holdings in other undertakings did not amount to the exploitation of property for the purpose of obtaining income therefrom on a continuing basis because any dividend yielded by that holding was merely the result of ownership of the property and not the product of an economic activity within the meaning of the Sixth Directive. Transactions that consisted of obtaining income on a continuing basis from activities which went beyond the acquisition and sale of securities, such as transactions carried out in the course of a business trading in securities, could fall within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll