header-logo header-logo

18 March 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax hike attack on consumer’s ‘wallet’

Increases to the insurance premium tax, announced in the Budget, will push up the cost of before and after the event legal expenses insurance.

The Treasury increased the standard rate of Insurance Premium Tax to 10 per cent in this week’s Budget following an increase from six per cent to 9.5% in November 2015.

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, brands the increase “a direct attack on the responsible consumer’s wallet”.

“This is not a tax on the insurers; it is a tax that the policy holder has to pay directly if they want to protect themselves in a claim,” she says.

“This tax increase should not be taken in isolation. With the government increasing the fees people have to pay to use our courts for civil claims, anyone would think they are actively pricing hardworking families and individuals up and down the country out of the justice system.

“Legal expenses cover such as this is supposed to help pay for the costs associated with seeking justice. Now, even that will be less affordable.”

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll