header-logo header-logo

04 January 2007 / Glyn Maddocks
Issue: 7254 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

The tax man can do no wrong

No matter how strong a negligence and maladministration claim against HMRC, it will almost certainly fail as a matter of principle. Glyn Maddocks explains

A recent ruling in the Chancery Division has far reaching implications for tax payers. Andrew Simmonds QC, sitting as deputy judge, held that although HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) was in breach of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (ICTA 1988) this did not give rise to a cause of action for damages; nor did HMRC owe a common law duty of care to tax payers.

Background

Neil Martin is a small-time building subcontractor based in Cumbria. In early 1999, he formed a company Neil Martin Ltd, with the intention of transferring his sole trader business to that company.

In the construction industry subcontractors are subject to a statutory tax deduction scheme. A new scheme was due to start on 1 August 1999. Both the old and new schemes are governed by ICTA 1988, Pt XIII, Ch IV, ss 559 to 567. A subcontractor must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll