header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines is intrugued by a Revenue U-turn and the meaning of residency

HM Revenue & Customs have issued a statement relating to last years’ limited amnesty for undisclosed offshore accounts. It will be remembered that an opportunity arose for those with such accounts to disclose them and pay a fixed 10% penalty rather than to feel the full weight of the Revenue falling on them for lack of disclosure. The Revenue does not like to call this an amnesty because nobody is being relieved of any tax; they are just paying a limited penalty. The term off shore disclosure facility is the preferred term.

The Revenue had the advantage of a successful application to the courts for the disclosure of offshore bank accounts of the customers of a number of the major banks. This meant that those with such accounts could never be sure whether the details had already been provided to the Revenue and they ought therefore to come clean for fear of worse consequences awaiting them. The Revenue subsequently issued a statement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll