header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

15 January 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines is intrugued by a Revenue U-turn and the meaning of residency

HM Revenue & Customs have issued a statement relating to last years’ limited amnesty for undisclosed offshore accounts. It will be remembered that an opportunity arose for those with such accounts to disclose them and pay a fixed 10% penalty rather than to feel the full weight of the Revenue falling on them for lack of disclosure. The Revenue does not like to call this an amnesty because nobody is being relieved of any tax; they are just paying a limited penalty. The term off shore disclosure facility is the preferred term.

The Revenue had the advantage of a successful application to the courts for the disclosure of offshore bank accounts of the customers of a number of the major banks. This meant that those with such accounts could never be sure whether the details had already been provided to the Revenue and they ought therefore to come clean for fear of worse consequences awaiting them. The Revenue subsequently issued a statement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll