header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines foresees that putting a foot wrong could land taxpayers in trouble

Everyone will remember the amnesty a couple of years ago where people were encouraged to disclose unreported income and accept to a mitigated penalty. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) did not like it being called an amnesty. It preferred the term “offshore disclosure facility”. Those who failed to disclose under this amnesty were going to be subject to investigations which would be “intrusive and thorough”. Well, nearly. In the Budget, Mr Darling announced that those who did not come clean before will be given another opportunity to do so—I wonder what happened to all the intrusive and thorough stuff. All they now say is that they “will pursue those who do not disclose”.

Details of the new amnesty have now been announced—this one is called the New Disclosure Opportunity. You have to smile. Picture the scene. Man in balaclava goes into bank and says to cashier: “See this gun? I would like to allow you an opportunity ….” Anyway, this new amnesty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll