header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines foresees that putting a foot wrong could land taxpayers in trouble

Everyone will remember the amnesty a couple of years ago where people were encouraged to disclose unreported income and accept to a mitigated penalty. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) did not like it being called an amnesty. It preferred the term “offshore disclosure facility”. Those who failed to disclose under this amnesty were going to be subject to investigations which would be “intrusive and thorough”. Well, nearly. In the Budget, Mr Darling announced that those who did not come clean before will be given another opportunity to do so—I wonder what happened to all the intrusive and thorough stuff. All they now say is that they “will pursue those who do not disclose”.

Details of the new amnesty have now been announced—this one is called the New Disclosure Opportunity. You have to smile. Picture the scene. Man in balaclava goes into bank and says to cashier: “See this gun? I would like to allow you an opportunity ….” Anyway, this new amnesty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll