header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 September 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Peter Vaines foresees that putting a foot wrong could land taxpayers in trouble

Everyone will remember the amnesty a couple of years ago where people were encouraged to disclose unreported income and accept to a mitigated penalty. Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (HMRC) did not like it being called an amnesty. It preferred the term “offshore disclosure facility”. Those who failed to disclose under this amnesty were going to be subject to investigations which would be “intrusive and thorough”. Well, nearly. In the Budget, Mr Darling announced that those who did not come clean before will be given another opportunity to do so—I wonder what happened to all the intrusive and thorough stuff. All they now say is that they “will pursue those who do not disclose”.

Details of the new amnesty have now been announced—this one is called the New Disclosure Opportunity. You have to smile. Picture the scene. Man in balaclava goes into bank and says to cashier: “See this gun? I would like to allow you an opportunity ….” Anyway, this new amnesty

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll