header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines the second coming of the Finance Act

The Emergency Budget turned quickly into a Finance Act and contained some helpful clarification about the new capital gains tax rules. It was interesting to note that the day before our Budget, Russia decided to scrap capital gains tax (CGT) as a measure intended to increase economic activity. Huh. Don’t they know that you increase economic activity by big increases in taxation.

There are some transitional provisions in respect of capital gains tax to deal with gains arising before and after Budget day. There was considerable uncertainty on Budget day about the meaning of gains “arising” because those arising before 23 June are taxable at 18% and those arising afterwards may be charged at the 28% rate.

A similar uncertainty existed relating to individuals taxed on the remittance basis where a gain was made on a disposal before Budget day but was not remitted until after Budget day. The new rule is that the date of remittance will determine whether the gains are treated

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll