header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

08 January 2016 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7681 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7681_vaines
Peter Vaines discusses a rare taxpayer victory over residence

The case of James Glyn is of considerable importance because it is virtually the only case in living memory where the taxpayer has won a case on residence—leaving aside the admirable efforts of Mr Grace before the Special Commissioners, which went down in flames on appeal.

Residence cases are notoriously fact dependent and only occasionally do any new principles (or refinements of existing principles) arise.

So it was with Glyn. In very broad terms, Glyn left the UK in 2005 to take up residence in Monaco and the First Tier Tribunal had to decide whether he had made a distinct break. The tribunal reviewed all the facts and conducted the necessary multi factorial evaluation, concluding that he had indeed made a distinct break by substantially loosening his social and family ties.

A great result for Glyn but unfortunately, the Upper Tribunal did not see matters quite the same way (HMRC v James Glyn [2015] UKUT 0551, [2015] All ER (D) 125 (Oct)).

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll