header-logo header-logo

16 May 2019 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

In his roundup of the latest tax cases, Peter Vaines minds the GAAP, & ponders the difference between a car & a van

  • The tax position of goodwill of a professional practice.
  • Deciding whether a building is a ‘dwelling’.
  • Cars, vans and income tax on a benefit in kind.
  • Minding the GAAP.

The recent case of Richard Villar v HMRC [2018] TC 6983 considered the tax implications of a sale of goodwill by a professional person, and is very helpful in clarifying the law in this area.

Mr Villar had a successful medical practice and he sold the business as a going concern to Spire Healthcare Diagnostics Limited for £1m. Mr Villar said that the consideration should be assessed to capital gains tax. However, HMRC argued that the payment was subject to income tax.

A crucial part of the HMRC argument was that virtually the whole of the payment was attributable to goodwill and they said it could not be transferred to Spire because the goodwill was personal to him.

HMRC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll