header-logo header-logo

16 May 2019 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

In his roundup of the latest tax cases, Peter Vaines minds the GAAP, & ponders the difference between a car & a van

  • The tax position of goodwill of a professional practice.
  • Deciding whether a building is a ‘dwelling’.
  • Cars, vans and income tax on a benefit in kind.
  • Minding the GAAP.

The recent case of Richard Villar v HMRC [2018] TC 6983 considered the tax implications of a sale of goodwill by a professional person, and is very helpful in clarifying the law in this area.

Mr Villar had a successful medical practice and he sold the business as a going concern to Spire Healthcare Diagnostics Limited for £1m. Mr Villar said that the consideration should be assessed to capital gains tax. However, HMRC argued that the payment was subject to income tax.

A crucial part of the HMRC argument was that virtually the whole of the payment was attributable to goodwill and they said it could not be transferred to Spire because the goodwill was personal to him.

HMRC

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll