header-logo header-logo

The Taxman cometh

30 October 2014 / Francesca Kaye , Mary Hodgson
Issue: 7628 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Francesca Kaye & Mary Hodgson discuss the important changes to capital gains tax and compensation payments

In the case of Zim Properties Ltd v Proctor [1985] STC 90, 58 TC 371, the court decided that the right to take court action for compensation or damages is treated as an intangible asset for capital gains tax (CGT)/corporation tax purposes. This does not, however, apply to rights pursuant to statute or contract.

All references to CGT in this article apply equally to corporation tax.

According to the decision in Zim, anyone receiving compensation or damages, whether pursuant to a court order or negotiated settlement is treated as disposing of that asset (the right to sue) and the sum received is the gain which attracts CGT.

The right to sue is treated as having no acquisition cost as there will not have been any expenditure involved in acquiring that right, and the entire amount of the compensation will therefore be taxable.

Extra statutory concession D33—Pre-January 2014

To counteract the effect of Zim,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll