header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Taylor Review found wanting

ofc

A proposal by the Taylor Review into employment practices to make employers pay similar National Insurance contributions for the self-employed as they do for employees might help discourage exploitation, solicitor Stephen Levinson, consultant, Keystone Law, writes in this week’s NLJ. However, he says its proposal to incorporate case law into legislation ‘ignores the appalling complexity that can thus be created’, and renaming ‘workers’ as ‘dependent contractors’ fails to alter anything of substance. Moreover, its recommendation that the law be regularly re-examined reveals ‘little appreciation of the practical difficulty government departments have every year in securing parliamentary time’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll