header-logo header-logo

01 July 2020
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Tech protocol for international arbitration could ‘change future’

Six law firms have collaborated to launch a draft protocol on the use of tech in international arbitration

The draft protocol, which was released this week for wider consultation, addresses how parties in arbitration can practically and cost-effectively meet their obligations regarding data handling and cybersecurity. It has been drawn up by Hogan Lovells, CMS, Herbert Smith Freehills, Ashurst, DLA Piper and Latham & Watkins. LexisNexis also participated in a private consultation period conducted recently in respect of the protocol. The six firms aim to release a post-consultation draft later this year.

Technology and digitisation in arbitration is changing how dispute resolution practices operate, and arbitral parties are keen to maximise cybersecurity and data protection measures. The protocol will have global application and has therefore been designed to be flexible and take into account all jurisdictions.

Michael Taylor, associate at Hogan Lovells, said: ‘We are delighted to participate in this initiative and to help shape discussions around the role of new technologies in the arbitration process.

‘Dispute resolution is changing at a fast pace, and securing a consistent approach to arbitral procedures and cybersecurity across the industry is vital. This is particularly important now in light of the COVID-19 situation around the world and as flexible working becomes more common.’

Myfanwy Wood, senior international arbitration lawyer at Ashurst, said: ‘This initiative has the ability fundamentally to change the future of arbitration.

‘New technologies have a critical role to play in improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, security, transparency and to widen access to the arbitration process. Having an industry-wide protocol to act as a reference point for parties on key issues to consider when adopting new digital case management platforms will accelerate this process significantly.’

The draft ‘Protocol for Online Case Management in International Arbitration’ is available for consultation until 31 August 2020. It can be viewed at: bit.ly/3dMtjQt. Comments should be emailed to platforms.protocol@hsf.com.

Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll