header-logo header-logo

22 April 2026
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Technology , Criminal , Artificial intelligence , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Technology push to assist in capture of fraudsters & fakers

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) will invest in technology to catch tech-reliant fraudsters and handle voluminous case materials

It will implement its first case management system and invest in more automation, technology assisted review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI), according to its 2026–27 business plan, published last week.

SFO interim director Graham McNulty said the ‘increasing sophistication’ of AI was making it easier to dupe victims, while cryptoassets gave criminals the means to hide their gains at ‘the click of a button’.

However, those same technologies created ‘significant opportunities for the SFO. Automation, AI and big data all provide ways to radically change our approach to intelligence analysis. Proactively tracking suspects and suspicious activity has never been so easy’.

WilmerHale partner Lloyd Firth welcomed the focus on innovation, but noted the business plan revealed the SFO ‘does not have a case management system in place and is only now making tentative use of TAR’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll