header-logo header-logo

22 April 2026
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud , Technology , Criminal , Artificial intelligence , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

Technology push to assist in capture of fraudsters & fakers

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) will invest in technology to catch tech-reliant fraudsters and handle voluminous case materials

It will implement its first case management system and invest in more automation, technology assisted review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI), according to its 2026–27 business plan, published last week.

SFO interim director Graham McNulty said the ‘increasing sophistication’ of AI was making it easier to dupe victims, while cryptoassets gave criminals the means to hide their gains at ‘the click of a button’.

However, those same technologies created ‘significant opportunities for the SFO. Automation, AI and big data all provide ways to radically change our approach to intelligence analysis. Proactively tracking suspects and suspicious activity has never been so easy’.

WilmerHale partner Lloyd Firth welcomed the focus on innovation, but noted the business plan revealed the SFO ‘does not have a case management system in place and is only now making tentative use of TAR’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll