header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Tenants can be choosers

Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt analyse the intricacies of rent payment

In the case of Thomas v Ken Thomas Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1504, the tenant, who paid rent on a monthly basis, failed to pay rent that fell due on 1 November 2004. The tenant subsequently offered to pay rent for December. What should a landlord do in such a situation? In the current economic climate it may be tempting for landlords to accept offers like this. However, in doing so, they should be aware that they will waive the right to forfeit the lease for non-payment of the unpaid earlier instalment of rent. As the landlord in Thomas discovered, it was not possible to avoid this problem by purporting to accept the tenant's payment in satisfaction of the November rent arrears when the tenant had made it clear that the payment was made in relation to the December rent.

Breaches of a lease can be either “once and for all” or “continuing”. Breaches of obligations to complete specific acts within a definite and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll