header-logo header-logo

Tenants can be choosers

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt analyse the intricacies of rent payment

In the case of Thomas v Ken Thomas Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1504, the tenant, who paid rent on a monthly basis, failed to pay rent that fell due on 1 November 2004. The tenant subsequently offered to pay rent for December. What should a landlord do in such a situation? In the current economic climate it may be tempting for landlords to accept offers like this. However, in doing so, they should be aware that they will waive the right to forfeit the lease for non-payment of the unpaid earlier instalment of rent. As the landlord in Thomas discovered, it was not possible to avoid this problem by purporting to accept the tenant's payment in satisfaction of the November rent arrears when the tenant had made it clear that the payment was made in relation to the December rent.

Breaches of a lease can be either “once and for all” or “continuing”. Breaches of obligations to complete specific acts within a definite and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll