header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Tenants can be choosers

Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt analyse the intricacies of rent payment

In the case of Thomas v Ken Thomas Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1504, the tenant, who paid rent on a monthly basis, failed to pay rent that fell due on 1 November 2004. The tenant subsequently offered to pay rent for December. What should a landlord do in such a situation? In the current economic climate it may be tempting for landlords to accept offers like this. However, in doing so, they should be aware that they will waive the right to forfeit the lease for non-payment of the unpaid earlier instalment of rent. As the landlord in Thomas discovered, it was not possible to avoid this problem by purporting to accept the tenant's payment in satisfaction of the November rent arrears when the tenant had made it clear that the payment was made in relation to the December rent.

Breaches of a lease can be either “once and for all” or “continuing”. Breaches of obligations to complete specific acts within a definite and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll