header-logo header-logo

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Tenants can be choosers

Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt analyse the intricacies of rent payment

In the case of Thomas v Ken Thomas Limited [2006] EWCA Civ 1504, the tenant, who paid rent on a monthly basis, failed to pay rent that fell due on 1 November 2004. The tenant subsequently offered to pay rent for December. What should a landlord do in such a situation? In the current economic climate it may be tempting for landlords to accept offers like this. However, in doing so, they should be aware that they will waive the right to forfeit the lease for non-payment of the unpaid earlier instalment of rent. As the landlord in Thomas discovered, it was not possible to avoid this problem by purporting to accept the tenant's payment in satisfaction of the November rent arrears when the tenant had made it clear that the payment was made in relation to the December rent.

Breaches of a lease can be either “once and for all” or “continuing”. Breaches of obligations to complete specific acts within a definite and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll