header-logo header-logo

Termination by stealth

19 May 2011 / Melanie Adams
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL , Employment
printer mail-detail

Melanie Adams considers how to end an employee’s contract without telling him

Where a contract of employment contains an express contractual right to do so, an employer may lawfully terminate the contract without notice by making a payment in lieu of notice (PILON).

But must the employee be notified that a payment in lieu of notice is being made in order for a PILON clause to take effect and terminate the contract immediately? This was the main issue for resolution in Société Générale v Geys [2011] EWCA Civ 307, [2011] All ER (D) 350 (Mar).

The point was worth €2.5m to the claimant.

Facts of the case

He was employed by the defendant bank in its London branch. A major part of his remuneration package consisted of the bank’s discretionary bonus scheme and fixed income sales scheme.

His contract of employment contained the following clause: “[The bank] reserves the right to terminate your employment at any time with immediate effect by making a payment to you in lieu of notice (or, if notice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll