header-logo header-logo

Terror funds

20 September 2006 / Nick Ryder
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Charities and terrorist funding: where does your donation go? Nick Ryder reports

Before the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 (9/11), the international community’s attitude towards financial crime focused on the prevention of money laundering, the illegal drugs trade and fraud. The events of 9/11 resulted in a monumental shift in political attitudes and led to a financial war on terrorism. Terrorist finance was combated by the United Nations (UN) in its Declaration to Eliminate International Terrorism 1994.
The International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism 1999 defines funds for terrorism to include assets of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form.

sources of funding

Terrorists have traditionally relied upon two sources of funding: state and private sponsors. State-sponsorship of terrorism is where governments provide logistical and financial support to terrorist organisations. It is now more likely, due to the financial war on terrorism, that terrorists will obtain funding from private donors or sponsors.
The funding of terrorism is difficult to prevent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
back-to-top-scroll