header-logo header-logo

20 September 2006 / Nick Ryder
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Terror funds

Charities and terrorist funding: where does your donation go? Nick Ryder reports

Before the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 (9/11), the international community’s attitude towards financial crime focused on the prevention of money laundering, the illegal drugs trade and fraud. The events of 9/11 resulted in a monumental shift in political attitudes and led to a financial war on terrorism. Terrorist finance was combated by the United Nations (UN) in its Declaration to Eliminate International Terrorism 1994.
The International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism 1999 defines funds for terrorism to include assets of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form.

sources of funding

Terrorists have traditionally relied upon two sources of funding: state and private sponsors. State-sponsorship of terrorism is where governments provide logistical and financial support to terrorist organisations. It is now more likely, due to the financial war on terrorism, that terrorists will obtain funding from private donors or sponsors.
The funding of terrorism is difficult to prevent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll