header-logo header-logo

Terrorism

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

CC v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 3316 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 160 (Dec)

The powers created by Sch 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 were far reaching and, so far as the power to detain was concerned, affected the liberty of the person.

Accordingly, they had to be, in principle, strictly construed and it was incumbent on the officer to inform the person that he was being detained and why.

The fact that detention was not used in the vast majority of cases where a Sch 7 examination was considered necessary did not affect the correct construction of the powers since detention might be required. The only purpose of any examination had to be to determine whether a person was a terrorist within the meaning of s 40(1)(b). In principle, how and the extent to which a person appeared to be a terrorist could provide a lawful justification for the Sch 7 examination. However, all would depend on what the officers knew and why they had decided to use their powers.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll