header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Terrorism

CC v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 3316 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 160 (Dec)

The powers created by Sch 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 were far reaching and, so far as the power to detain was concerned, affected the liberty of the person.

Accordingly, they had to be, in principle, strictly construed and it was incumbent on the officer to inform the person that he was being detained and why.

The fact that detention was not used in the vast majority of cases where a Sch 7 examination was considered necessary did not affect the correct construction of the powers since detention might be required. The only purpose of any examination had to be to determine whether a person was a terrorist within the meaning of s 40(1)(b). In principle, how and the extent to which a person appeared to be a terrorist could provide a lawful justification for the Sch 7 examination. However, all would depend on what the officers knew and why they had decided to use their powers.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll