header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013 / Philip Henson
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Testing times

Philip Henson reviews the government consultation on fee remissions for the courts & tribunals

All fee charging courts and tribunals operate a system of remissions to ensure that individual applicants who are unable to afford fees are not denied access to their services. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published a consultation, which closed this month, on a wide-ranging reform of the fee remission (waivers) system for the courts and tribunals.

It is proposed that the new system will apply across all fee charging business areas with the exception of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).

As fees are being introduced to the employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) for the first time in autumn of this year, the subject of fee remissions may be a new concept to many employment law practitioners and HR professionals.

The proposals

The consultation proposes a new two-stage test based on the disposable capital and monthly income of the claimant. The applicant will have to pass both tests in order to be eligible for a fee remission.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll