header-logo header-logo

30 May 2013 / Philip Henson
Issue: 7562 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Testing times

Philip Henson reviews the government consultation on fee remissions for the courts & tribunals

All fee charging courts and tribunals operate a system of remissions to ensure that individual applicants who are unable to afford fees are not denied access to their services. The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published a consultation, which closed this month, on a wide-ranging reform of the fee remission (waivers) system for the courts and tribunals.

It is proposed that the new system will apply across all fee charging business areas with the exception of the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber).

As fees are being introduced to the employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) for the first time in autumn of this year, the subject of fee remissions may be a new concept to many employment law practitioners and HR professionals.

The proposals

The consultation proposes a new two-stage test based on the disposable capital and monthly income of the claimant. The applicant will have to pass both tests in order to be eligible for a fee remission.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll