header-logo header-logo

The (new look) solicitor’s equitable lien

01 April 2022 / Anthony Field
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
77120
Bott & Co v Ryanair is an important development for access to justice, writes Anthony Field
  • Considers the landmark case on solicitor’s lien, Bott & Co v Ryanair, including at lower courts and Supreme Court, and the reasons for the decision.

On 16 March 2022, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of Bott & Co Solicitors Limited v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8, [2022] All ER (D) 54 (Mar). The judgment has developed the law of a solicitor’s equitable lien that has existed for more than 200 years and the decision will resonate across the legal profession. It is an important case for access to justice.

The solicitor’s equitable lien

In its traditional form, the solicitor’s equitable lien entitles a solicitor who acts for a client in litigation to recoup their fees out of the money recovered by their client. However, if the opposing party pays the money directly to the client, having been made aware of the solicitor’s entitlement to be paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll