header-logo header-logo

The (new look) solicitor’s equitable lien

01 April 2022 / Anthony Field
Issue: 7973 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
77120
Bott & Co v Ryanair is an important development for access to justice, writes Anthony Field
  • Considers the landmark case on solicitor’s lien, Bott & Co v Ryanair, including at lower courts and Supreme Court, and the reasons for the decision.

On 16 March 2022, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of Bott & Co Solicitors Limited v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8, [2022] All ER (D) 54 (Mar). The judgment has developed the law of a solicitor’s equitable lien that has existed for more than 200 years and the decision will resonate across the legal profession. It is an important case for access to justice.

The solicitor’s equitable lien

In its traditional form, the solicitor’s equitable lien entitles a solicitor who acts for a client in litigation to recoup their fees out of the money recovered by their client. However, if the opposing party pays the money directly to the client, having been made aware of the solicitor’s entitlement to be paid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll