header-logo header-logo

10 July 2026 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8169 / Categories: Opinion , Health , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The Assisted Dying Bill Mark II

254473
© Getty images

What are its chances? Michael Zander KC assesses the prospects of the Bill becoming law

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, introduced by Kim Leadbeater MP and approved by the House of Commons in June 2025, was talked out in the Lords where more than 1,200 amendments were tabled. The Bill stalled at the end of last session, before it had reached the voting stage on amendments. Opponents of the Bill said that the 1,200 amendments were to make the Bill fit for purpose. Proponents claimed they were based on a determination to defeat the Bill by filibustering.

The Bill has now been re-introduced by Lauren Edwards, Labour MP for Rochester, who came second in the ballot for Private Members’ Bills in the current session. The second reading of the Bill is scheduled for 11 September.

Like for like?

The Bill is the same as that passed by the House of Commons in June 2025 and therefore technically qualifies as ‘identical’ for the purpose of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll