header-logo header-logo

16 September 2019
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Constitutional law , EU
printer mail-detail

The Brexit week ahead

Attention focuses on the Supreme Court this week, as Justices consider three appeals on prorogation.

All eleven Justices will hear the appeals, from courts in Scotland, England and Wales, and Northern Ireland. Proceedings begin on 17 September, are scheduled to last three days and will be live-streamed and available to watch on the Supreme Court website.

Last week, the Court of Session (Inner House) held the Prime Minister (PM) acted unlawfully when advising HM the Queen to prorogue Parliament because its purpose was to ‘stymie’ Parliament. Prior to this, the High Court of England and Wales held that the matter was non-justiciable. Similarly, the High Court in Belfast held last week that the court did not have authority to decide on a claim that a no-deal Brexit and imposition of hard border would break the Good Friday peace agreement, as it was a political matter.

On Monday this week, PM Boris Johnson sat down for a Brexit working lunch with EU Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker. EU officials have dismissed the PM’s claims that ‘huge’ progress is being made on Brexit talks and say they are still waiting for plausible suggestions from the UK on the Northern Ireland backstop. The PM’s self-imposed 30-day deadline to produce a viable alternative to the backstop (as promised to German Chancellor Angela Merkel) is due to end on Friday.

Meanwhile, the PM has said he will refuse to comply with the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019, which compels him to call for an Art 50 extension, prompting MPs to warn he could be sent to sent to prison for contempt of court. However, proceedings were launched in the Court of Session last week, under which the Clerk of Court could sign the request in Johnson’s stead, if the court so orders. The proceedings rely on the court’s special jurisdiction of nobile officium, to make an order it considers equitable.

Finally, the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development has warned that the UK faces losing billions in exports earnings if it does not secure trade agreements with key markets before a no-deal Brexit. As a member of the EU, the UK has access to approximately 40 trade agreements through which member states obtain preferential market access in about 70 countries. Unless finalised or negotiated before a no-deal Brexit, the UK would lose access to preferential trade agreements and would have to export under World Trade Organization Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariffs.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll