header-logo header-logo

30 May 2025 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The CCRC: radical reset required?

220715
Jon Robins backs the calls of both Baroness Butler-Sloss & the Justice Committee for the watchdog’s leadership to resign

People don’t think about the frailties of our criminal justice system and its potential for wrongful convictions, until it happens to them or to a loved one. With this in mind, I was struck by an extraordinary intervention by Baroness Elizabeth Butler-Sloss in a debate in the House of Lords on the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) earlier this month.

The first female Lord Justice of Appeal shared with fellow peers that someone who worked for her ‘may have been unjustly sent to prison well over ten years ago’. Her solution to the problems that beset our miscarriage of justice watchdog was radical—sack the lot. ‘Is it not time that the entire commission is set aside and new people appointed, with everything done as a matter of some urgency?’ she said.

As a veteran CCRC-watcher, the entire brief debate was simply extraordinary. It was tabled by a former solicitor general, Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll