header-logo header-logo

30 May 2025 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal
printer mail-detail

The CCRC: radical reset required?

220715
Jon Robins backs the calls of both Baroness Butler-Sloss & the Justice Committee for the watchdog’s leadership to resign

People don’t think about the frailties of our criminal justice system and its potential for wrongful convictions, until it happens to them or to a loved one. With this in mind, I was struck by an extraordinary intervention by Baroness Elizabeth Butler-Sloss in a debate in the House of Lords on the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) earlier this month.

The first female Lord Justice of Appeal shared with fellow peers that someone who worked for her ‘may have been unjustly sent to prison well over ten years ago’. Her solution to the problems that beset our miscarriage of justice watchdog was radical—sack the lot. ‘Is it not time that the entire commission is set aside and new people appointed, with everything done as a matter of some urgency?’ she said.

As a veteran CCRC-watcher, the entire brief debate was simply extraordinary. It was tabled by a former solicitor general, Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll